|
Blogs:
Blogging assignments will be a key part of your written
work in the class. You will be given a question or a series
of questions with each Tuesday reading. Every Monday you
must publish a blog in response to the question or questions
on your blogging page by 5pm. It would be best for you
if you do them over the weekend. I will check the blogs
weekly to evaluate them. The
blogs will be graded on the basis of your interaction with
the question—how much thought are you evidencing,
how sophisticated are you being? I will give you either
a check ++, a check +, check, or check- based on your work.
A check++ is very rare—it means that you have created
a flawless masterpiece. A check+ means that you are above
average yet not quite perfect. A check means that you are
obviously engaged with the question and are doing an adequate
job. A check- means that you are slipping beneath the level
of work I expect from you. Unacceptable work will receive
a 0. At the end of the semester, I will then translate
your collection of checks into a point total out of 100
(depending on the amount of blogs we do this semester).
When
writing your blog, please be sure to follow both of the
following steps, numbering them clearly in your entry.
You do not need to include these instructions (I will remember
them).
- Summarize
your general experience with the reading (How did
it make you feel? Did you agree or disagree with
the argument? Did it resonate with anything in your
personal life? Was it difficult or easy to read and
why?). [4 meaty but concise sentences]
- The
last section of the Response Paper will vary from
week to week, but it usually will be a specific question
or assignment regarding the text. [at least a paragraph—10-12
meaty but concise sentences]
Essays
1, 2, & 3: Each of these essays will be
a 3-5 page paper focusing on a specific question directly
tied to our readings or discussions. These essays must
follow the expectation guidelines for written work and
conform to the general writing guidelines provided online.
|
Research
Essay: The research essay is your most important
assignment. It is the primary testing ground for your writing
skills and is a critical means of accumulating points.
You will not be allowed to revise your research paper—if
you participate in our workshops and take advantage of
your conferences with me, you should not have to. The research
essay must also follow the expectation guidelines for written
work and conform to the general writing guidelines.
Take
Charge Assignment: In
a group, you will be assigning readings to the class as
well as will be responsible for leading discussions on
the topic.
Revision
Policy: Your first two primary assignments may
be revised within two weeks of being returned for additional
point consideration. Your total may be raised a maximum
of only one grade (from a C- to a B-). No late assignments
may be revised. Please understand that a revision is not
merely correcting spelling and grammar errors or adding
a few sentences—that is a waste of both our times.
To revise a paper is to begin from scratch, reassessing
the question to create a polished argument. Anyone interested
in revising an assignment must have a conference with me
in order for the revision to be accepted. All revisions
must also include the original, graded draft. Work that
I consider to be substandard will not be eligible for revisions
at my discretion—this is to prevent you from taking
advantage of my generosity for allowing revisions.
Quizzes:
I reserve the right to quiz you on your daily reading assignments.
The number of questions will vary for each day—sometimes
as few as 3 or 4 questions, sometimes as many as 10. Although
these quizzes may seem a small part of the class (five points
here, ten points there), they do add up and affect your grade
in the long run.
In-Class
Writing: In addition to quizzes, I also reserve
the right to ask you to perform a writing exercise on any
given day. These exercises will vary—sometimes they
will be as relaxed as freewriting on a theme or a question.
Sometimes they will require you to apply critical terms
to a specific textual instance. These assignments will
test your ability to think, process, and respond clearly
and effectively in an “on the spot” situation.
I may collect these at any time or ask you to hand them
in with other secondary or primary assignments.
|
Mini
Essay
“The
way that college students negotiate their social,
economic and (often meager) political lives is
governed by their interaction with the media.
Whether they know it or not, the media has shaped—and
will continue to dominate—their lives.”
Agree
or disagree with the content, form, or assumptions
of the above statement. Clearly define the most important
terms for your argument while offering support for
your stance. If you need to use a dictionary, please
use the OED online (see the library databases).
Generate at least but no more than two pages.
Take
Charge Assignment
After
our first paper, I will be asking you as a class
to generate recent texts for our discussion. You
will be assigned into groups of two or three and
asked to locate somewhere between three and four
sources for us to discuss for your given week. You
will also be responsible for helping with directing
discussions during that week. Your grade of 100 points
will involve all of these aspects. I also reserve
the right to allot different point amounts to different
members of the group.
1.
In a few phrases or sentences, clearly identify
the focus of the topic you’re working on.
It can be as broad as “Gender and the Media” or
as focused as “Representations of Women’s
Bodies in the Media” or even “Women
and Sexuality: How Sex in the City redefines
modern stereotypes of women.” [Hint: If
you’re working on something for another
class, thinking about your major, or considering
what to work on for your research paper, you
might be able to figure out a way to kill two
birds with one stone by making us work on it
as well.] Keep in mind that our focus will always
be on how the content is being delivered and
the assumptions behind the given argument. We
therefore spend less time on the details of the
issue and more time on the argumentative qualities
surrounding the representations—less time
on the content and more time on the form
2.
Provide me with some primary
texts. You must find a) at least two
print or online, quality
essays--not random fansites
or Wikipedia, but journalistic sources.
These should contain obvious
and debatable arguments.
Two excellent databases to check out
are Academic OneFile and LexisNexis Academic
Give me a copy, but ideally it should
be available
online,
so provide
me with the url; b) at least
one text that is not written media (podcasts,
films, TV shows,
documentaries). If you don’t
own it or it’s not
downloadable, make sure our
library has it by searching
DELCAT. I’m not buying
any new movies or PBS specials
for kicks (unless, they’re....you
know...good).
Here
are a few topics I’ve been playing
with as a warning of what I will be assigning:
Middle East
and America; 9/11 and the Media; Party
Politics and the State (think the media
frenzy already going on
over next year’s elections); Reality
TV vs Reality; The Dangers of Media Feeding
Frenzies; Infotainment as Protest; Education
Reform; Blurring
Lines: Docu-dramas that go too far; America
and Latin America; Health and Africa;
EU Politics and Foreign
Economies.
|
Essay
1
For
this essay you have 3 questions to choose from. You
must turn to at least one
of our readings for evidence, as well as
provide at
least one additional, qualitative source (qualitative
as in a substantial essay or selection from a book--something
more than a dictionary entry or Wikipedia article).
Note
that you do not have to answer every question within
a given cluster; the first prompt is the most important
while the following questions are there to help you
get the ball rolling. Remember to always go beyond the
confines
of our class discussion in your own paper. Please choose
the best possible quotations to illustrate and support
your argument. Avoid first person to the best
of your ability.
1. Using
examples of form from our recent texts, generate
a rubric on the nature of argumentation. What
qualities do we find in a good argument and how do
we recognize them? Do your best to define the word “argument” in
your own words as your own argument dictates, and
then use evidence from some of our readings to illustrate
your definition. Notice that your definition need
not recognize any of these essays as “perfect” in
regards to argumentation, though that is one strategy
for dealing with this topic. Instead, consider using
examples that illustrate good or adequate qualities
of argumentation while suggesting techniques for
improvement.
A
few but by no means all the things you could consider
discussing in your rubric are issues like organization,
quality of evidence, techniques for presenting evidence,
transitions and connections within the argument, fallacies,
and clarity of language.
2. What
is journalism’s relationship to objectivity
in the postmodern age? Is the ideal
of journalistic integrity a thing of the
past, or could it ever be
trusted? Using evidence from our recent
texts, locate what
role,
if any,
objectivity
should play in the
actions and products of the media. Clearly
define your most important terms and delineate
the scope
of your discussion.
Some
of the issues you may consider covering in
this paper are the necessity of objectivity,
the dangers of a
changing media, the need for both traditional
and non-traditional forms of journalism, the
connections between satire and objectivity,
the benefits of subjective approaches, and the
responsibility
of journalists
to the
state and its citizens.
3. What
abilities must readers bring into play when confronting
journalistic pieces? What is the responsibility
of the audience in regards to understanding and interpreting
the media? Looking at the content and the form of
our recent texts, designate what sort of skills are
required by readers in the “information age” for
them to best digest the materials presented to them.
Some
of the ideas you might focus on are passive versus
active audiences, skepticism and the media, trusting
particular forms of media over others, reading skills
and the detection of fallacies, and textual verses
visual (or aural) processing.
I’m
looking for three to five pages of double spaced,
12 point Times New Roman font (as usual). One
inch margins all the way around, please. Include
your name, my name, the class, and the date in
the upper
left hand corner of the first page. Every
following page should have your last name and the page number in
the upper right hand corner. Remember to
include a Works Cited page at the very end
(to practice your MLA format as well as get in
the habit of always
informing your reader of your sources).
Please
read through the MLA
Citation and Plagiarism page for Works Cited
page guidelines as well as a general discussion as to
how to avoid any accidental plagiarism. Also
checkout the online
edition of the Bedford Handbook for general citation
information as well as a sample
paper.
You
should also look at the Writer's
Checklist on my Writing site. This
will give you clues as to how to go about putting
the paper together, what I expect from a good paper,
and
what my pet peeves are about grading papers (i.e.
how to avoid upsetting me for no good reason).
Lastly,
checkout the descriptions I give of my own Grading
Standards, so that you know what I'm looking for when
I put grades on your papers.
This
Essay is due on Monday, September 24th. Good
luck!!!

Essay
2
For
this essay you have two giant questions to choose
from related to the four topics we have looked
at so far. You must turn to at
least one of our readings for evidence,
as well as provide at least one additional,
qualitative sources (qualitative as
in a substantial essay or selection from a book--something
more than a dictionary
entry or Wikipedia article). For the forgetful
or lazy, here is a quick reminder of the topics
we have looked at: Business and (or of?) the
Media, Reality TV, Internet
Dangers and Celebrity
Obsession.
Remember
to always go beyond our class discussion
in your own paper. Please choose
the best possible quotations to illustrate and support
your argument. Avoid first person to the best of
your ability.
Morality
Given some of the inherent assumptions of American
capitalism (accumulation of profit, rampant
consumption, and cutthroat competition),
morality seems to
be an odd thing for us to ever care about.
But each
of our topics has manifested issues of morality:
they hold others (or ourselves) accountable
in situations where responsibility curbs
profits or they suggest we judge others by
means of
an
obvious
and universal moral code while making ourselves
feel better over other people’s failures.
Either way, the assumptions behind the workings
of morality and postmodern culture are largely
unexamined.
Looking
at one or two of out topics, examine the issue
of American morals and the media, explaining
what is assumed and
how that particular topic (or topics) elucidates
the nature of morality.
[Here is s
a not so subtle warning: notice that I am
not using the word “ethics,” but
morality, and if you decide to use them as
synonyms,
you better have a good reason why.]
Reality
In all of our topics, we have assumed that
a highly permeable boundary exists between
reality
and representation,
between what is real and what is simulated.
We seem to desire to know what is real. This
is
why we like
to watch Britney Spears act like a Louisiana
trailer park mom. This is why journalists should
tell us
the truth (expose the real) and why internet
predators should use the “right” words to define
themselves (depraved individuals rather than “child
lovers”). As Americans we yearn for,
and seem to have a right to, the real.
But
is this truly the case? Is there a reality, a
referent, a physical manifestation of truth
we can be certain of, or has postmodern culture
completely
replaced “reality” with simulations?
In what way can we ever be certain we perceive the “real”?
Or does our possession of reality (instead
of the simulation) even matter? Using one or
two
of our
topics, examine the certainty of reality and
its relationship to the consumption of postmodern
media.
I’m
looking for three to five pages of double
spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font (as usual). One
inch margins all the way around, please. Include
your name, my name, the class, and the date in the upper
left hand corner of the first page. Every
following page should have your last name and
the page number in the upper right hand corner. Remember
to include a Works Cited page at the very
end (to practice your MLA format as well as get in
the habit of always informing your reader of your
sources).
Please
read through the MLA
Citation and Plagiarism page for Works
Cited page guidelines as well as a general discussion
as to how to avoid any accidental plagiarism. Also
checkout the online
edition of the Bedford Handbook for general citation
information as well as a sample
paper.
You
should also look at the Writer's
Checklist on my Writing site. This
will give you clues as to how to go about putting
the paper together, what I expect from a good paper,
and
what my pet peeves are about grading papers (i.e.
how to avoid upsetting me for no good reason).
Lastly,
checkout the descriptions I give of my own Grading
Standards, so that you know what I'm looking for
when I put grades on your papers.
This
Essay is due on Monday, October 29th. Good
luck!!!

|
| |
|
Breaking
News Research Paper: Investigating the Media
This
essay will be argumentative in nature and based on
a debatable issue that involves some aspect of the
media in popular culture. Focus your topic on
ideas, themes, or events that interest you. Then, examine
how this topic is presented in the media. Remember
that "the media" is a very broad term here;
don't limit your possibilities (that's my job). Your
purpose, as always, is to analyze how the media goes
about creating meaning (and convincing us of that meaning)
regarding your topic.
Your
thesis statement for this paper should consist of a persuasive
statement about the topic you have chosen. Remember
your thesis must be as focused as possible on a debatable
subject for which you supply evidence to prove your thesis. Remember
that you are not writing an encyclopedia article. You
must define a thesis and prove it through presented research.
Required
Length: 10-12 pages minimum.
Required
Primary Sources: Your primary source or
sources must be clearly identified by the scope of your
project.
Required
Secondary Sources: Minimum of 6—At least 2
books, at least 2 Scholarly Periodicals (scholarly rather
than popular). Books may take the place of Periodicals. Any
online sources (not including periodicals retrieved from
online databases) must be in excess of the 6 required sources
(unless your topic warrants an internet focus).
Required
Source Packet: As part of my never ending program
of cruelty, I am asking you to turn in with your paper
a photocopy of the pages from which you are citing or summarizing
text. In other words, you will photocopy the page
in the book, journal, magazine, or database where the quote
you use appears. The quote will be highlighted or
underlined and the page reference (the page the quote appears
in your paper) will be written in the top or lower right-hand
margin of the photocopy. These pages do not have
to be clean of all your other marks—as long as I can quickly
locate the quote you are using in your paper, I do not
care how messy they are.
Required
Steps:
1) a.
You will blog and e-mail me
your final topic and 2-3 potential theses
(so that I may approve your focus) by 5
pm on Friday, November 2nd(-10
points). b. You will then respond to
at least three of
the people in your blogging group (see
the blog page; all the people in
your column are in your group) by praising
(or disparaging) their topics and suggesting
how their potential theses could be made
better (clarity, specificity....which
thesis do you think is best and why)
by 5pm on Monday,
November 5th (-10
points).
2) Bring
in a bibliography of
at least ten sources to class on Wednesday,
November 7th (-15
points).
3)
E-mail me an annotated bibliography of
at least ten sources by 5pm on
Friday, November 9th. This
is merely your (perhaps changed) bibliography
but this time with a paragraph (5 to
10 meaty but concise sentences)
following each entry that summarizes
the argument of the source and makes
it clear how you intend to use (or
attempt to use) it (-20 points).
4) You
will bring a mini-draft of
your introduction and conclusion, along
with a topic sentence outline of your
paper to class on Monday, November
12th (-20
points).
5) Bring
a mini-draft & working outline of
your paper to class on Wednesday,
November 13th. This
outline must include a. a revised
draft of your introduction and conclusion
along with b. the topic sentences to
your paragraphs, and c. your quotations. The
exact format of your outline is optional--organize
the outline in such
a way that it works for you. My
only requirement is that your quotes,
introduction, and conclusion are
typed (the font and format are again
your choice). Be
prepared to present your organization
strategy to the rest of the class (-25
points)
6) You
will provide another blog on
your topic by Thursday, November
14th. In
the blog you will describe a. your final
thesis, b. the necessary
steps in your arguments, c. the type
of sources you are looking at, d. your
favorite source, and e. one interesting
fact or thing you learned about your
topic. (-15
points)
7) There
will be a mandatory 15-minute conference on Friday,
November 15th or Monday,
November 18th at
which point you will present to me a.
the paper as it stands so far [should
be very close to done], b. a final
draft of your works cited page [including
only the sources you are using in your
paper], and c. your source packet.
(-20 points)
8) The paper,
your outline, and your source packet are all
due at the beginning of class on Wednesday,
November 21st.
Failure
to complete ALL of these steps on the aforementioned dates
means that points will be deducted from your final possible
total. Remember, there can be no “Rewrites” for the
research paper.

Essay
3
Looking
at one or two specific arguments of your choosing—texts
we looked at in class or other sources—analyze
the rhetorical efficacy of the given pieces. Focus on
one of the topics below, paying particular attention
to the questions assigned to the topic.
Video Game Violence
What values does the author assert or presuppose about
the nature of gaming? What givens is he or she working
from and do those givens skew the argument?
Global Warming
What does the debate over global warming reveal about
the nature of evidence? What sort of evidence is the
best evidence for this topic?
Satire and Infotainment
Given that infotainment is usually backed by an agenda,
how does that agenda manifest itself? Does infotainment
create the desire to change the status quo or encourage
people to do nothing but laugh about the status quo?
Gender Discrimination
What types of proof are most convincing when it comes
to the issue of gender discrimination? Do statistics
trump personal experience, or is discrimination only
possible to detect on a case-by-case basis?
Please
keep yourself to three to five pages of double
spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font. One
inch margins all the way around. Include
your name, my name, the class, and the date in
the upper left hand corner of the first
page. Every following page should have your
last name and the page number in the upper
right hand corner. Remember to include a Works
Cited page at the very end (to practice your
MLA format as well as get in the habit of always
informing your reader of your sources).
Please
read through the MLA
Citation and Plagiarism page for Works
Cited page guidelines as well as a general discussion
as to how to avoid any accidental plagiarism. Also
checkout the online
edition of the Bedford Handbook for general
citation information as well as a sample
paper.
You
should also look at the Writer's
Checklist on my Writing site. This
will give you clues as to how to go about putting
the paper together, what I expect from a good
paper, and what my pet peeves are about grading
papers (i.e. how to avoid upsetting me for no
good reason).
Lastly,
checkout the descriptions I give of my own Grading
Standards, so that you know what I'm looking
for when I put these grades on your papers.
A
physical copy of this essay is due in my box
in MEM 213 on
Friday,
December 7th at noon.
No EXCEPTIONS.....

|

|
|